Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Feb 13 10_53_41 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TJR
Docket No: 3342-99
29 October 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 October 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Your record reflects that on 20 July 1983 you

The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 27 December 1982 at
the age of 18.
received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for wrongful use of
marijuana.
$572, restriction and extra duty for 45. days, and reduction to
paygrade E-1.
a urinalyses, and were diagnosed as drug dependent.

The punishment imposed was forfeitures totalling

You later tested positive for further drug use on

Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative
separation action.
consult with legal counsel or to present your case to an
administrative discharge board.
Shortly thereafter, the
discharge authority directed your commanding officer to issue you
an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct and on
23 November 1983 you were so discharged.

At this time you waived your rights to

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity and your contention that you would like
your discharge upgraded.

However, the Board concluded these

factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the
characterization your discharge given the seriousness of your
drug related misconduct.
Given all the circumstances of your
case, the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and
no change is warranted.
denied.

Accordingly, your application has been

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

You are entitled to have the

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 10_51_25 CDT 2000

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02565-99

    Original file (02565-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, regret for the actions which led to your discharge, the letters of reference attesting to your academic achievements since your discharge, and the fact that it has been nearly 16 years since you were discharged. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00649-99

    Original file (00649-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00898-01

    Original file (00898-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 June 1983 an ADB recommended you be issued a general discharge by reason of Shortly thereafter, on 17 May After misconduct due to drug abuse. discharged by reason of misconduct normally receive discharges Accordingly, you were under other than honorable conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04540-01

    Original file (04540-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Drug abuse...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07464-08

    Original file (07464-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03029-01

    Original file (03029-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The punishment imposed was a $286 forfeiture of pay, restriction for 30 days, extra duty for 45 days, and a reduction to On 14 December 1982, after undergoing a medical evaluation, medical authorities determined that you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9804225

    Original file (NC9804225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 23 September 1982 you received your seventh NJP for possession and sale of LSD, possession of a dangerous weapon, an unauthorized absence of about...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02566-05

    Original file (02566-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repetitive drug-related misconduct, some of which occurred after you were warned of the consequences of further misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00061-01

    Original file (00061-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. thereafter, on 27 August 1980, you received NJP for possession of marijuana and were awarded a $500 forfeiture of pay and restriction and extra duty for 30 days. ...